It's a cat & mouse game where the search engines create algorithms to determine which sites are *actually* relevant and marketing/seo people try to take advantage of said algorithms. Hobbyists and smaller organizations don't have the money or time to optimize their site for search engines like commercial companies do. So their sites rank lower.
The supposed decrease in the quality of web search engine results has seemingly been confirmed by a study conducted by German researchers. The scientists monitored Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo for ...
"SEO is a constant battle and we see repeated patterns of review spam entering and leaving the results as search engines and SEO engineers take turns adjusting their parameters," reads the report.
Even without conscious intervention, search engine results can reflect racist attitudes. There is an old computer saying, “garbage in, garbage out.” ... Search engines don’t deliver truth on ...
Half the search results don't even include your search terms at all. And the few that do are all generic big box sites like Wikipedia, spam sites like Pinterest, or e-commerce sites. Not any personal webpages by someone whose hobby is that topic, nor blogs that discuss it, nor forums where people help each other out with it.
Also, using site-specific searches or Google’s “Tools” to narrow down results can help. Why do I get irrelevant results even with specific queries? Google might misunderstand query intent, especially with complex or ambiguous searches, or results might be influenced by SEO tactics that don’t align with user intent.
This might make them more prominent, even if their information is incorrect or manipulative. Even without conscious intervention, search engine results can reflect racist attitudes. There is an old computer saying, “garbage in, garbage out.” If racists and sexists use a phrase often, the search engine may mindlessly reflect their attitudes.
Search engines in general use complex systems to serve up your search results, and the more complex the systems get. the harder it is to do it well. Google, in particular has run afoul of the issue, since, over the last two years, in attempts to provide better results, they have made their search engine system so complex that it may be it ...
It's not you, every search engine just sucks now. Here's an article about it.Here's a google search engineer's comment on reddit telling their side of the story, which adds up to nothing useful and reads a bit gaslighty to me, but might be of interest to some folks. One good tip is to append "reddit" to your searches. You'll get real people's answers to most questions that way, not a bunch of ...
Search engines, once the go-to tool for finding information and discovering new websites, are gradually becoming obsolete. This bold prediction may come as a surprise, but if we closely examine the current state of search engine results, it becomes clear that they are no longer as useful as they once were. The Current State of Search Engine Results
Don't want reviews, Why not use -reviews in your queries? You want a specific expression, use quotation "marks". Looking for a PDF, use filetype:pdf. There are many ways to get better results by making better research. Also, I don't think the results are less of quality, they just follow more what most people want because of AI.
Search-engine bias can alter an individual user’s perception of what online information is available, and where that information can be found. Stanford University breaks search engine bias into 3 concerns: Search-engine technology is not neutral. It has embedded features in its design that favor some values over others. Major search engines ...
Some links to ad-laden listicles which don't have good suggestions. Zero links to good results. Also links to various youtube videos that are the youtube equivalent of blogspam. Bing: Mostly links to sites that try to scam you or charge you for a worse version of free software. Some links to ad-laden listicles which don't have good suggestions.
While search engine representatives and light hatters (the whitest of the white hatters) say that having great, link-worthy content and links is enough to get. Menu; ... 7 Reasons Why Search Engines Don’t Return Relevant Results 100% of the Time. Facebook X LinkedIn Print. Previous post; Next post; Home; SEO. Tech. Life Style. More. Menu ...
Here’s where things get… complicated. Search engines don’t just toss up random results — they have a secret recipe for deciding which pages deserve the top spot. ... look good on your ...
These bots look for certain aspects within content indexing, which savvy content creators can manipulate to get higher search ranking. These content creators design their web pages to rank high in Google’s search engine results. Because of this manipulation, Google search crawlers don’t understand the content they index; they just index it.
Updated No, it's not just you - search engine results really are getting worse as the internet is flooded with low-effort garbage from SEO farms and affiliate link sites, a group of German researchers has concluded.. The boffins made their determination after spending a year reviewing results for 7,392 product review queries on Google, Bing and DuckDuckGo, which they said is the first ...
Theres a reason why their search engines suck on google, but they shouldnt on youtube, there is no reason for their search engine to fail this bad. It also makes me wonder why their search engine and filters suck and dont work, theres also no reason for them not to work, And the filteres should be a lot better but for some reason every single ...
