When you base an argument on reasoning that is not logical, you have committed a fallacy. One type of fallacy is special pleading. Special pleading involves a person applying rules and standards to others while exempting him- or herself. In addition, with special pleading, the person does not provide a logical reason for why he/she should be exempt from the rules or standards.
The Special Pleading Fallacy. Special Pleading is when one makes up an exception or moves the goal posts when one’s claim is shown to be false. This logical fallacy also sometimes goes by the name “The Taxicab Fallacy” because the one committing this fallacy simply makes exceptions when it suits his fancy, just like how a passenger of a ...
Special Pleading is a logical fallacy where a person applies standards, principles, rules, or guidelines to others while making themselves or their own arguments exempt from the same critical criteria, without providing adequate justification for the exemption. This fallacy is often characterized by the act of offering a subjective, biased, or ...
Special Pleading Examples Special Pleading Examples in Commercial. Examples of Special Pleading in Commercial: Special Pleading Fallacy is a logical fallacy where the person making an argument tries to get out of being refuted by claiming that their opponent has done something wrong or unfair, rather than addressing the argument’s substance.
Special pleading is a common fallacy that can be difficult to spot because it often involves subtle biases or emotional appeals. The key to identifying special pleading is to ask whether the exception is justified by relevant and sufficient reasons. If not, it's likely a case of special pleading.
Special Pleading. Taxonomy: Logical Fallacy > Informal Fallacy > Special Pleading 1 Form: Rule: Xs are generally Ys. x is an X. x is an exception to the rule because it is I (where I is an irrelevant characteristic). Therefore, x is not a Y. Example: The law requires everyone to follow the speed limit and other traffic regulations, but in Suffolk County, exceptions should be made for cops and ...
The special pleading fallacy occurs when someone gives certain conditions and that individual claims a special exception to that condition without proper justification. “Because I said so” is a popular retort among parents. But just because it’s popular does make it less of a logical fallacy. “Saying so”–in and of itself–does not ...
Underlying such special pleading or claims to deep insight or empathy is a presumption that the views of the advocate cannot be evaluated because the opponent lacks the capacity to make any valid judgement. All such claims should be treated with deep skepticism. Another variant of the fallacy Special Pleading occurs when an advocate, faced with ...
This fallacy is easy to spot on others but hard to spot on yourself. If you are accused of special pleading, don’t dismiss it out of hand. Take the time to reconsider your argument and whether or not the accusation is warranted. Remember that the key is whether or not the “relevant difference” justifies the “special treatment.”
Special pleading (or claiming that something is an overwhelming exception) is a logical fallacy asking for an exception to a rule to be applied to a specific case, without proper justification of why that case deserves an exemption. Usually this is because in order for an argument to work, a proponent needs to provide some way to get out of a logical inconsistency — in a lot of cases, this ...
Special pleading (also known as a double standard) is an informal fallacy that occurs when an exception is created to a principle, law, rule, generalization, or something roughly similar to these when we would expect that principle (or whatever it may be) to apply to whatever is being excluded and no rational justification is given for why the ...
The Implications of Special Pleading. The implications of special pleading reach far beyond individual arguments. When it becomes a common practice in discourse, it can contribute to a culture of hypocrisy, inconsistency, and mistrust. Moreover, special pleading can suppress productive dialogue by diverting attention away from legitimate concerns.
Description of Special Pleading. Special Pleading is a fallacy in which a person applies standards, principles, rules, etc. to others while taking herself (or those she has a special interest in) to be exempt, without providing adequate justification for the exemption. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:
Special pleading is a form of spurious argumentation where a position in a dispute introduces favorable details or excludes unfavorable details by alleging a need to apply special considerations or exemptions to the claims supporting an argument.. These considerations or exemptions are pushed into the argument without proper critique or analysis. Essentially, this involves someone attempting ...
Special pleading is a fallacy of informal logic whereby a party to a controversy exempts himself (or one whom he has a special interest in protecting) from a criticism that he applies to others, without adequate justification for that exemption. Contents. 1 Argument structure;
Abstract This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called 'special pleading (SP)'. One way to grasp the meaning of the special pleading fallacy is to focus on a general principle of fairness: We ought to treat individuals alike unless there is some relevant difference between them that merits the differential treatment.
Moving or shifting the goalposts (also known as special pleading) is another great example of a simple informal logical fallacy — that pretty much says what it is already. Essentially, the ...
Another form of special pleading is to demand unequal evidence for something. For example, Kathy believes that pixies exist despite the fact that she's never seen one, let alone seen any real evidence for one - but there are so many stories about them out there, they must exist! But when her friend Emma says that she believes in frost giants ...
