mavii

Acknowledgments are not required for a submitted manuscript and are best removed. If necessary, remove author names, institutions, grant titles, and grant numbers. 3. Research locations. If clues to authorship might result from providing the names of institutions where research was conducted or data were gathered, blind or omit those names.

Avoid citing unpublished manuscripts. Check that all identifiers have been removed from electronic files such as Microsoft Word documents (File → Information → Check for issues → Inspect Document) Please note that inadequately blinded manuscripts will be returned to authors for further anonymizing.

Below we outline the methods to ensure your manuscript is effectively blinded prior to submission. Note that a complete title page, acknowledgements, and author contributions must be uploaded alongside the blinded manuscript. If the manuscript is in Word format, follow steps 1 - 4 (these steps are appropriate for Word ...

While recognizing that the blinding of manuscripts is not a perfect system, the AJR comes down on the side of blinding in the belief that it is better for all concerned and easier for the reviewer not to know than to know the source of the manuscript being reviewed. In our judgment, knowing the source of the manuscript introduces a potential bias that is best avoided: such a bias actually lies ...

When authors and reviewers are blinded from each other, there is a foundation for an objective review. This is what is called the double-blinded review and the mainstay for science review. ... For Editors: Once the manuscript has completed the initial screening in the editorial office, matching the manuscript with an appropriate reviewer is the ...

Appropriate reporting on blinding in trial protocols and manuscripts, as well as future directions for blinding research, will also be discussed. ... members of safety and data monitoring committees, and (11) manuscript writers . In a blinded clinical study, treatment assignment is the information most frequently withheld from these groups ...

(4.4) Blinding of manuscript during review process You have just accepted an invitation to review a submitted manuscript from a journal that uses a double-blind review policy. In reading through the manuscript, you strongly suspect the identity of the authors who submitted the work. Although the authors’ names do not directly

What Is Blinded Manuscript? This journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. What is the purpose of blinded review? The advantage of single blind reviewing is it allows your reviewers to critique papers without any influence being

The “Anonymous” reference will be changed after the two independent reviewers’ positive votes on the manuscript. Title, abstract and key words: the title is centred and written in Times New Roman 11, ... Once you have prepared the blinded manuscript according to the guidelines above, ...

Blinded manuscripts were identical, except that all known identifiers, including author and institution identifiers in the title page, main text, figures and tables, had been deleted (by N.A.K. or J.H.) electronically. To avoid the problem of inadvertently revealing authorship, the entire bibliography/endnotes section was removed before the ...

Submitting a manuscript for publication without first scrubbing it of all hidden data is akin to walking across the stage to accept a national award with a 3-foot strand of toilet paper trailing from your left shoe. It can make a lasting impression. If you have collaborated with others on writing a manuscript, used Track Changes to make

Since this journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure, authors are therefore requested to submit: A blinded manuscript without any author names and affiliations. Self-identifying citations and references in the article text should be avoided. A separate Title page. Please include the following Declarations on the Title page:

Blinded manuscript preparation guidelines As part of the blind peer review process, authors will need to submit a blinded manuscript without a title page (no author details), as well as a separate title page (containing author details). Blinded manuscripts should be compiled in the following

As author, you can (but do not have to) omit author information so reviewers are "blinded", but this is entirely optional (and in the vast majority of cases, blinding is not necessary).Author information will still be in the metadata (for the editor to see), but reviewers will not see the metadata. With references (self-citations), mentionings of app or websites developed by the authors etc it ...

Information to help prepare the Blinded Manuscript. Besides the obvious need to remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, there are other steps that need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double-blind peer review. To assist with this process the key items that need to be observed are as ...

Yes, I also generated “document” type new article component called full manuscript and configured it as “supplementary file” to prevent it from taking the place of the blinded manuscript file. My journals curerntly use OJS 3.2.1.3 Note: I suggest to apply the opposite, and configure the blinded manuscript as the primary submission ...

The title page must be uploaded separately from the manuscript, as an additional file, during the submission process. Check that the text of your manuscript is also blinded; that is to say, any references within the manuscript which might reveal you to be the author are removed.

Materials and methods: Forty manuscripts submitted to the journal Dermatologic Surgery were assessed by four reviewers, two of whom were randomly selected to be blinded and two unblinded regarding the identities of the manuscripts' authors. The primary outcome measure was the initial score assigned to each manuscript by each reviewer ...

[Show full abstract] blinded or an unblinded copy of the manuscript. Review quality was assessed by two editors and the corresponding author. Review quality was assessed by two editors and the ...

Subsequently, Gotzsche [7] also went on to use this approach and, on three occasions, wrote two blinded manuscripts [8], [9]. We implemented this approach in 2004 while in the process of preparing a manuscript that dealt with alternative approaches to eliciting patient utilities for health states [10]. The team statistician provided complete ...