5.1: Prelude to Inductive Arguments; 5.2: Cogency and Strong Arguments Inductive arguments are said to be either strong or weak. There’s no absolute cut-off between strength and weakness, but some arguments will be very strong and others very weak, so the distinction is still useful even if it is not precise.
In contrast, an inductive argument that does not provide a strong reason for accepting the conclusion are called weak inductive arguments. Whereas strong inductive arguments are defeasible, valid deductive arguments aren’t. Suppose that instead of saying that most birds fly, premise 2 said that all birds fly. ...
Inductive arguments, by contrast, are said to be strong or weak, and, although terminology varies, they may also be considered cogent or not cogent. A strong inductive argument is said to be one whose premises render the conclusion likely. A cogent argument is a strong argument with true premises. All arguments are made better by having true ...
Valid arguments are known to be very sound when the premises is true. Arguments based on inductive reasoning can either be weak or strong. The weak argument is not convent but strong arguments are strong if only the premises is true. Essay hacks will help you understand what a strong argument is and what you need to make a weak argument strong.
A strong argument is an inductive argument that succeeds in having its conclusion be probably true, given the truth of the premises. A weak argument is an inductive argument that fails in having its conclusion be probably true, even given the truth of the premises. With this in mind, let’s next see how we can identify inductive arguments.
Inductive arguments are widely used in science. For example, if science makes a claim that ‘smoking causes cancer’, it does not mean that everyone who smokes is sure to get cancer. It only establishes that smokers have a high probability of cancer as compared to nonsmokers. Inductive arguments can be either strong or weak. Strong and Weak ...
Well, an inductive argument’s strength is a matter of degree. Inductive arguments that are not strong are called weak arguments. A weak argument fails to provide the probable support for the given conclusion. There is no well-defined or sharp line between strong and weak inductive arguments.
An inductive argument is one in which the premises are intended to make the conclusion probable (i.e., more probable than not), without guaranteeing it. A strong argument is one in which it is probable (but not necessary) that if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true. An weak argument is one in which it is not probable
A Deductively Strong argument is one that is 1) valid and 2) the premises are reasonable for you to believe. An Inductively Strong argument is one that is 1) cogent, 2) the premises are reasonable for you to believe, and 3) it is not defeated by your total evidence. A Weak argument is one that is neither deductively nor inductively strong.
Categorizing inductive arguments as strong v weak is similar to categorizing arguments as valid or invalid for deductive arguments. But there will not be a crisp cut off between strong v weak arguments. See the barrel full of apples example in the textbook (C3).
There is a lot more to say about both deductive and inductive arguments, and we will discuss these topics in detail later. Exercises. Exercise Set 7A: #1: Create a standardized argument that is logically strong, but factually incorrect. #2: Create a standardized argument that is logically weak, but factually correct. #3:
Strong and Weak Inductive Arguments. Suppose I say that Sheila is good at math and you ask me why I think so and I offer this argument: "Sheila is good at math because she is a physics major." The inferential claim involved in this argument is inductive. I am only claiming that Shela's being a physics major makes it probable or likely that she ...
In chapter 1, we said that inductive arguments are “defeasible,” meaning that we could turn a strong inductive argument into a weak inductive argument simply by adding further premises to the argument. In contrast, deductive arguments that are valid can never be made invalid by adding further premises. Recall our “Tweets” argument:
A strong argument is one where the premises provide substantial support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true, while a weak argument has premises that do not adequately support its conclusion, making it less likely to be true. This distinction is crucial in evaluating inductive reasoning, as it helps to determine how persuasive and credible an argument is based on the evidence provided.
In contrast, a weak inductive argument is one in which the truth of the premises does not provide strong support for the conclusion. The strength of an inductive argument is determined by factors such as the quality and quantity of evidence, the relevance of the premises to the conclusion, and the absence of any known counterexamples. 2. Select ...
Importantly, note that whether or not the premises in the arguments above are true does not matter in the least for determining whether these arguments are strong or weak. Strength of inductive arguments is only concerned with the connection between the premise(s) and conclusion. Cogent and uncogent inductive arguments We can't forget that the ...
Inductive support comes in varying degrees; the stronger the inductive reasons, the less risky the inductive leap. This page titled 2.7: Inductive Arguments is shared under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jason Southworth & Chris Swoyer via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the ...
An inductive argument is inductively strong when you have the following: If all its premises were true, then it its highly likely or probable that its conclusion would also true. "Strong" and "weak" are the terms used to describe the possibilities for the logical strength of inductive arguments. To determine if an argument is strong or weak:
