The wiki link you gave, "special pleading" is: Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle (without justifying the special exception).[1][2][3][4][5] This is the application of a double standard.[6][7]
The special pleading fallacy occurs when an individual applies rules or standards to others while exempting themselves or a particular group from those same criteria. It is a form of double standards, where a claim or assertion is altered or interpreted in a manner that favors one side without justifiable reasoning.
special pleading (countable and uncountable, plural special pleadings) Arguing that a particular case is an exception to a generally accepted rule, without justification and without a relevant basis. 1997 September 30, The Court-Martial of Sandra Gilbert , season 3, episode 2:
A special pleader was a historical legal occupation. The practitioner, or "special pleader" in English law specialised in drafting "pleadings", in modern terminology statements of case. History Up to the 19th century, there were many rules, technicalities and difficulties in drafting pleadings and claims and defences could be dismissed for ...
Special Pleading. Taxonomy: Logical Fallacy > Informal Fallacy > Special Pleading 1 Form: Rule: Xs are generally Ys. x is an X. x is an exception to the rule because it is I (where I is an irrelevant characteristic). Therefore, x is not a Y. Example: The law requires everyone to follow the speed limit and other traffic regulations, but in Suffolk County, exceptions should be made for cops and ...
Fallacyfiles dot org ".... The fallacy of Special Pleading occurs when someone argues that a case is an exception to a rule based upon an irrelevant characteristic that does not define an exception..." There are no empirical evidence for the laws of logic, preventing Agrippian regression of logic. Unbelievers attempt to make God who expressed his nature as the three laws of logic a special ...
Toggle Mechanics of Special Pleading subsection. 2.1 Examples of Special Pleading. 2.2 Non-Fallacious Exceptions. 2.3 Hallmarks of Special Pleading. 3 Why Special Pleading is Intellectually Dishonest. 4 Avoiding Special Pleading. 5 Recognizing and Countering Special Pleading. 6 Conclusion. 7 References. Toggle the table of contents. Special ...
Special Pleading is a logical fallacy where a person applies standards, principles, rules, or guidelines to others while making themselves or their own arguments exempt from the same critical criteria, without providing adequate justification for the exemption. This fallacy is often characterized by the act of offering a subjective, biased, or ...
The meaning of SPECIAL PLEADING is the allegation of special or new matter to offset the effect of matter pleaded by the opposite side and admitted, as distinguished from a direct denial of the matter pleaded.
Special pleading is a commonplace feature of newspaper opinion columns, political speeches, television panel discussions and the like. People who seek to air their convictions in such public forums are usually attempting to influence public policy. Often there is also an attempt at self-aggrandizement through moral and intellectual posturing.
Common law pleading was the system of civil procedure used in England, which early on developed a strong emphasis on the form of action rather than the cause of action (as a result of the Provisions of Oxford, which severely limited the evolution of the common law writ system).The emphasis was on procedure over substance. Law and equity evolved as separate judicial systems, each with its own ...
The special pleading fallacy occurs when someone gives certain conditions and that individual claims a special exception to that condition without proper justification. “Because I said so” is a popular retort among parents. But just because it’s popular does make it less of a logical fallacy. “Saying so”–in and of itself–does not ...
Abstract This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called 'special pleading (SP)'. One way to grasp the meaning of the special pleading fallacy is to focus on a general principle of fairness: We ought to treat individuals alike unless there is some relevant difference between them that merits the differential treatment.
This is the fallacy of asking to be held as an exemption to a rule that others are held by. It's typically used as an excuse for special treatment others don't receive, or to win arguments by claiming to have special insights others don't have. This is fallacious because even if someone has certain expertise or is part of a specific group, they still have to provide evidence and cogent reasons ...
Special pleading is a legal term that refers to the common-law system of pleading. This system required parties to exchange a series of court papers, such as replications, rebutters, and surrebutters, setting out their contentions in accordance with hypertechnical rules before a case could be tried. Often, cases were decided on points of pleading and not on the merits.
