mavii

SOUTH AFRICA First Respondent STEPHEN SIPHO MNCUBE N.O. Second Respondent ON DIGITAL MEDIA (PTY) LTD t/a STARSAT Third Respondent PETRUS FRANCOIS VAN DEN STEEN N.O. Fourth Respondent MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS Fifth Respondent REPLYING AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned, NORRIS CRAIG SNYDERS do hereby make oath and say: 1.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE) CASE NO.: 7788/ In the matter between:-RISIMA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION (SOC) LIMITED APPLICANT And THEMBA COLLEN MAVUNDZA 1 ST RESPONDENT. DEED REGISTRAR POLOKWANE 2 ND RESPONDENT. APPLICANT’S REPLYING AFFIDAVIT. I, the undersigned, DR NOKANENG S. Do hereby declare under oath ...

MERIAL SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD Third Respondent/Plaintiff ANSWERING AFFIDAVIT IN THE APPLICATION TO CONDONE THE FILING OF A REPLYING AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned, WILLEM ADRIAAN VAN ROOY do hereby make oath and state that: 1 I am a director at DM Kisch Inc. DM Kisch Inc are the attorneys of record for the respondents in this application and in ...

averments, assertions, allegations and contentions in the answering affidavit which are not specifically canvassed herein mustbe deemedto be disputed or denied. 7. Ratherthan deal seriatim with the answering affidavit, | find it moreconvenient to reply to the principal issues raised bythe Business RescuePractitioners.

Southern Africa Litigation Centre

3. I have read the respondent’s answering affidavit as well as the supplementary affidavit filed by the respondent on 10 December 20. I reply thereto as set out herein. Status of Dr Preston’s affidavit 4. The affidavit deposed to by Dr Preston is not supported by either: 4.1 A confirming affidavit deposed to by the respondent: or

Answering and Replying affidavits Answering affidavit The Respondent has the right to answer the allegations in the Applicant’s founding affidavit. This is done by way of the Respondent’s answering affidavit (aka opposing affidavit) that is made by the Respondent personally, or duly authorised person if the Respondent is not a natural person, and it is […]

the supporting affidavit. To the extent that the notice of opposition conflicts with the supporting affidavit, I deny it. Without detracting from the generality of that denial, the applicant wishes to reply briefly to one aspect of the notice of opposition. 4. I submit that the applicant is entitled to file a replying affidavit in terms of

REPLYING AFFIDAVIT . 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ... South African and international law and in good faith, they have resolutely refused to provide any meaningful justification. 8. The respondents‟ handling of this application is therefore concerning and, as will be demonstrated in the course of this affidavit, sets an unacceptable precedent ...

answering affidavit are true and correct. [37] Also, the deponent does not have personal knowledge of crucial aspects of the answering affidavit, such as the extent to which ‘internal processes’ were followed by the officials of the second respondent who developed the Draft Policy. Ad paragraphs 7-9 [38] The content of these paragraphs is ...

LAW SOCIETY OF SOUTH AFRICA'S REPLYING AFFIDAVIT . l, the undersigned, JOHANNES CORNELIS JANSE VAN RENSBURG do hereby make oath and state that: 2. 3. I am the Vice-President of the Law Society, which is an amicus curiae in this matter. I deposed to the founding affidavit delivered by the Law Society in this

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: TREVOR B GIDDEY, N.O. APPLICANT and J C BARNARD & PARTNERS RESPONDENT _____ APPLICANT’S REPLYING AFFIDAVIT _____ I, the undersigned ARTHUR MANFRED KRUGER do hereby make oath and say that : 1. I am the deponent to the Founding Affidavit in the Application for Leave to Appeal

South Africa. 1.2 The purpose of these practice guidelines is to promote and expedite access to the courts in applications on motion. The practice guidelines are to be applied so as to facilitate the expeditious handling of disputes and the minimization of costs involved. As such it seeks to inform how the courts in this magistrate court function.

(REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) In the matter between: CASE NO.: CCT99/13 COOL IDEAS 1186 CC Applicant and HUBBARD, ANNE CHRISTINE Respondent REPLYING AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned JOSUA FRANCOIS VAN DYK do hereby make oath and declare: 1. The facts set out below fall within my own knowledge and they are to the best of my belief both true and correct.

previously included in an affidavit, why its content is relevant to the application and why the other party won’t be prejudiced by it the supplementary affidavit being filed. 22. The second, and less common, is a fourth affidavit (or fifth, sixth etc.) after a replying affidavit has been filed. This type of affidavit is usually called a second

PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Third Respondent FILING SHEET PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Applicants hereby file their Replying Affidavit. SIGNED at JOHANNESBURG on 9th OF MAY 2023. _____ POWER SINGH INC. Attorneys for the Applicant 20 Baker Street, Rosebank JOHANNESBURG, 2196 Tel: +27 10 822 7860 Fax: +27 86 614 5818 Email: tina ...

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CC CASE NO: 50/12 SCA CASE NO: 440/2011 LCC CASE NO: LCC145/2010 In the matter between : ... LAURENCE EDWARD JUTA Respondent REPLYING AFFIDAVIT IN RULE 31 APPLICATION I, the undersigned, MARION HATTINGH state as follows under oath: 1 I deposed to the founding affidavit in the application for leave to ...

STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED Respondent _____ REPLYING AFFIDAVIT _____ I, the undersigned, MFUNDO NGOBESE state under oath that: 1 I am an adult male employed in the Cartels Division of the Competition Commission of South Africa. 2 2 The facts contained in this affidavit are true and, unless the context indicates ...