In further support of this response, Plaintiffs refer the Court to their accompanying brief and its exhibits as well as the legal arguments already set forth in Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and supporting brief (Dkt. # 81). Respectfully submitted, /s/ Kathryn Bruner James Daniel S. Korobkin (P72842) Michael J. Steinberg ...
II. Plaintiffs Are Entitled to Judgment as a Matter of Law. FEC’s summary-judgment opposition (Doc. 27) made no effort to dispute plaintiffs’ showing that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law (Doc. 25-1).2 So plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiffs have shown that, under a straightforward application ...
summary judgment motion. 4. Assert any additional facts. Additional facts may be included in the response only in the manner provided in section (b)(5)(iii)(B) below. 5. Make legal arguments or advocacy-oriented characterizations concerning the sufficiency, relevance or materiality of the moving party’s factual proffers.
In its Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, Wackenhut asserted that Plaintiff cannot establish the third and fourth elements of his prima facie case.2 Plaintiff’s Response fails to even address the third prima facie prong. Thus, it remains undisputed that Plaintiff cannot identify any white employees
Accordingly, any motion for summary judgment facing these circumstances must be denied as a matter of law. (Aqua-Life v. Pennsylvania Game Com’n, 153 Pa. Commw. 145 Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1993) Plaintiff’s Cause of Action Differs from the Defendants ; In light of the foregoing, to succeed in defeating the Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff may ...
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT . Plaintiffs, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”): ... ignore the aspects of Plaintiffs’ claim that turns on the common law governing parks and § 2.4.6
I. Summary Judgment Standard Summary judgment is warranted if the record evidence shows that “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’” Uncle Henry’s, Inc. v. Plant Consulting Co., 399 F.3d 33, 41 (1st Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56( c)).
SAMPLE SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESPONSE _____ COMES NOW Plaintiff Jane Roe, in opposition to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# XY) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Triable issues of fact exist with regard to both claims upon which the Defendants seek summary judgment. CLAIMS AND DEFENSES UPON WHICH JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT6 A. Claim 1: Sex ...
Score: 4.1/5 (40 votes) . A response to a summary judgment motion must be in writing, submitted by the deadline set by the assigned Administrative Judge, and include: (1) a statement that responds to the undisputed material facts listed in the summary judgment motion; and (2) a responsive analysis of the facts under the applicable legal ...
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs hereby move this Court, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment and an order permanently enjoining the ... and as the FEC has admitted in its response to Request for Admission # 4, it includes individuals who contract in all of the following ...
The Record in this case for purposes of Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, in part, includes: Plaintiff’s Complaint exhibits, Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendants’ First Set of Discovery; and the Declaration of Davidson County Deputy District Attorney General Roger D. Moore (Filed by Defendants). LEGAL STANDARD
Plaintiffs, § § v. § Civil Action No. A-07-CA-344 LY § GORDON E. LANDRETH, et al. § Defendants. § DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Defendants Gordon Landreth, Alfred Vidaurri, Jr., Rosemary Gammon, Robert Kyle
Support of Their Motion for Summary and Declaratory Judgment, including the Plaintiffs’ records request, the Defendants’ response, and a summary of the redactions that are at issue in this case. Plaintiffs’ Brief filed August 28, 2018 at pp. 1-6. In order to avoid unnecessary repetition, those facts are incorporated herein by reference.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROCEDURES . I. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT A. Contents: 1. A motion, together with such materials permitted by Rule 56(e) as the moving party may wish to serve and file; and 2. In a separate document, a statement of proposed findings of fact or a stipulation of fact between or among the parties to the action, or both; and 3.
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE HONORABLE COURT: On this day, [DATE], Defendant files this Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and shows the Court as follows: 1. The Evidence in Support of the Motion is Insufficient to Support Summary Judgment Defendant objects to Plaintiff’s ...
Before filing a motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff must ensure the motion meets procedural and substantive requirements. Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs such motions in federal courts, while state courts have their own rules. ... Opposing Party’s Response. The opposing party, often the defendant, may respond to a ...
JD Supra