A Guide to Peer Reviewing Journal Articles
For detailed guidelines see our Best Practice Guidelines on Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics. How to structure your report. Summary. Give positive feedback first. Authors are more likely to read your review if you do so. But don't overdo it if you will be recommending rejection. Briefly summarize the paper’s content and findings.
Any such submission is subject to all of the journal's usual procedures, with peer review handled independently of the relevant editor and their research groups. More information on types of peer review. Revised submissions Use of word processing software. It is important that the file be saved in the native format of the word processor used.
The team establishes and upholds the peer-review guidelines for editors, reviewers, and authors, which incorporate the best practices and editorial policies. ... The withdrawal of a reviewer requires the recruitment of a replacement, which slows down the peer review process; therefore, authors are encouraged to cooperate as much as possible in ...
The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. ... The main goal of the peer review is to support authors in their attempt to publish ethically sound and ...
Read the Wiley Guidelines on editorial standards and processes, including peer review. COPE guidelines for peer reviewers. Wiley provides membership of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) as an option for our journal editors. COPE serves more than 8,500 members around the world with practical tools, e-learning, seminars, and much more.
Authors who have benefited from the peer review process should consider becoming peer reviewers as a part of their professional responsibilities. Some journals require a formal process of appointment to the review panel, and some require specific expertise; anyone interested in becoming a reviewer should look for the journal guidelines on peer ...
You’ve received or accepted an invitation to review an article. Now the work begins. Here are some guidelines and a step by step guide to help you conduct your peer review. General and Ethical Guidelines. Step by Step Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript. Top Tips for Peer Reviewers. Working with Editors. Reviewing Revised Manuscripts
Authors may add research data, including data visualizations, to their submission to enable readers to interact and engage more closely with their research after publication. Please be aware that links to data might therefore be present in the submission files. These items should also receive your attention during the peer review process.
Follow the golden rule: Write the type of review you’d want to receive if you were the author. Even if you decide not to identify yourself in the review, you should write comments that you would be comfortable signing your name to. In your comments, use phrases like “the authors’ discussion of X” instead of “your discussion of X ...
The journal undertakes single-blind peer review. Reviewers are requested to treat the manuscript confidentially. The Managing Editor’s judgment is final with regard to suitability for publication. Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers . Preliminary selection . The Editors will evaluate the research articles before sending them for in-depth ...
When following peer review best practice, a manuscript’s handling editor should not act as an independent peer reviewer. In this context, a handling editor may be the associate editor who has organised peer review, regardless of whether they have sign-off on the final publication decision, which might escalate to an editor-in-chief.
Open peer review—where authors and reviewers are aware of each other’s identity. In some journals with open peer review the reviewers’ reports are published alongside the article. ... Along with avoiding a conflict of interest, there are several other ethical guidelines to keep in mind as you review the manuscript. Manuscripts under ...
Finally, we offer some resources to help you, as an author, respond to peer review in professional and constructive ways. What to Consider When Asked to Peer Review - COPE Guidance Flowchart ... Peer review guidelines provide basic principles and standards to which all peer reviewers should adhere during the peer review process in research ...
Open peer review: There are lots of different types of open peer review but typically, it means the reviewers know who the authors of the article are, and the authors will learn who the reviewers are at some point during the review or publication process. The reviewer’s name may also be disclosed alongside the article if it is published ...
The peer review process is entirely open and transparent. Each peer review report, plus the approval status selected by the reviewer, is published with the reviewer’s name and affiliation alongside the article. Authors are encouraged to respond openly to the peer review reports and can publish revised versions of their article if they wish.
related to peer review issues and bases these guidelines, in part, on the collective experience and wisdom of ... by authors Ownership Review owned by a journal or third party Review owned by the authors of the reviews Shared or mixed ownership of reviews Cite this as: COPE Council. COPE Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers — English.
Follow Guidelines: Adhere to any guidelines provided by the journal or publisher regarding ethical standards for peer review. By following these best practices for conducting a peer review, you can contribute to the advancement of knowledge in your field while upholding professional standards of integrity and excellence.
Clarity on how the review process is handled with authors and readers ensures the content published is trustworthy and is one of the most important aspects of peer review. Outlining clear guidelines for authors and reviewers on journal peer review processes and, ensuring non-peer reviewed content is clearly labelled establishes transparency.
