Pascal’s wager, practical argument for belief in God formulated by French mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal.In his Pensées (1657–58), Pascal applied elements of game theory to show that belief in the Christian religion is rational. He argued that people can choose to believe in God or can choose to not believe in God, and that God either exists or he does not.
“Pascal’s Wager” is the name given to an argument due to Blaise Pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in God. The name is somewhat misleading, for in a single section of his Pensées, Pascal apparently presents four such arguments, each of which might be called a ‘wager’—it is only the third of these that is traditionally referred to as “Pascal’s Wager”.
Pascal’s wager is a traditional argument that offers reasons for believing in the existence of God. Unlike other well-known arguments for God’s existence, such as ontological or cosmological, Pascal’s wager does not aim to prove that God exists, but only that it is rational to bet on that possibility. In the philosophical literature ...
Pascal’s Wager about God. Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) offers a pragmatic reason for believing in God: even under the assumption that God’s existence is unlikely, the potential benefits of believing are so vast as to make betting on theism rational. The super-dominance form of the argument conveys the basic Pascalian idea, the expectations argument refines it, and the dominating expectations ...
Pascal’s Wager has always felt more like a gamble than a genuine search for truth. It doesn’t ask us to believe because something is convincing; it asks us to believe because it might be safer or more rewarding. ... Regardless of how you evaluate the strength of our opposing arguments as we’ve given them above, both of us take ...
Pascal’s wager. So far we have discussed a number of arguments for or against the existence of God. In the reading for today, Pascal asks not “Does God ... One way to read Pascal’s argument that we should believe in God is as saying that believing in God dominates nonbelief. Recall the quote discussed above:
Pascal’s wager argument successfully demonstrates that theistic belief is a prudent strategy for maximizing felicity, in the absence of any rationally demonstrative evidence for or against the objective existence of God. As stated at the outset, Pascal’s wagerer is presumed to be concerned with his ethical felicity, which is why he cannot ...
There is another, different kind of argument left. It has come to be known as Pascal’s Wager. We mention it here and adapt it for our purposes, not because it is a proof for the existence of God but because it can help us in our search for God in the absence of such proof (91). Pascal also points out that this is a forced wager.
Pascal’s Wager, Jordan argued, may be viewed as a kind of “last ditch” argument for apologists and theism (24). After all, suppose one were to come up with an argument which convinced you that the truth of theism is quite unlikely indeed.
“Pascal’s Wager” is the name given to an argument due to Blaise Pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in God. The name is somewhat misleading, for in a single section of his Pensées, Pascal apparently presents at least three such arguments, each of which might be called a ‘wager’—it is only the final of these that is traditionally referred to as “Pascal ...
Conceptualized by the French mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) in his Pensées (French for “thoughts”), Pascal’s wager is a pragmatic argument that supports belief in God by arguing that theistic belief is the only proper attitude to adopt when faced with the question of God’s existence.Theism here is considered to be the proposition that God, thought to be ...
Pascal’s Wager is unique among theological arguments for the degree to which it evokes both fascination and disgust. The fascination, for some, derives from the fact that the argument brings together big ideas : infinity, God, salvation, prudential and evidential reasoning, and an analytical framework (decision theory) that provides tools for ...
Pascal’s wager is an argument that definitely has its place in philosophy and theology. But in my opinion, the mathematical side of Pascal’s wager was ahead of its time .
Pascal’s Wager is an argument for the existence of God developed by 17th century mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal. Pascal’s Wager is the most famous part of his collection of notes known as the Pensées. With the Wager, Pascal attempted to provide a compelling reason to believe in God based upon happiness and possible outcomes.
You might be familiar with it already but, in brief, 17th-century French polymath Blaise Pascal devised this argument in defense of a belief in a traditional, Christian view of God.
“Pascal's Wager” is the name given to an argument due to Blaise Pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in God. The name is somewhat misleading, for in a single paragraph of his Pensées, Pascal apparently presents at least three such arguments, each of which might be called a ‘wager’ — it is only the final of these that is traditionally referred to as ...
11. Tipped workers; wages For any employee who customarily and regularly receives tips or gratuities from patrons or others, the employer may pay a wage up to twenty-five percent per hour less than the minimum wage established by statute if the employer can establish by the employer's records of charged tips or gratuities or by the employee’s declaration for federal insurance contributions ...
ARGUMENTS FOR PROP 140 • Amends the AZ Constitution to establish the same signature requirement for all primary election candidates for any given office. • Eligible voters may vote for candidates regardless of party affiliation. • The legislature may determine the number of candidates advancing to the general election. • Prohibits using public monies for political party elections.
