An excellent discussion is well-organized. We bring to you authors a classic 6-step method for writing discussion sections, with examples to illustrate the functions and specific writing logic of each step. Take a look at how you can impress journal reviewers with a concise and focused discussion section! Discussion frame structure
Besides the target journal to be selected should be ready to accept articles with similar concept. In fact editors of the journal will not reserve the limited space in their journal for articles yielding similar conclusions. The title of the manuscript is as important as the structured sections * of the manuscript. The title can be the most ...
Gold Biotechnology (U.S. Registration No 3,257,927) and Goldbio (U.S. Registration No 3,257,926) are registered trademarks of Gold Biotechnology, Inc.
The discussion section is where you delve into the meaning, importance, and relevance of your results.. It should focus on explaining and evaluating what you found, showing how it relates to your literature review and paper or dissertation topic, and making an argument in support of your overall conclusion.It should not be a second results section.. There are different ways to write this ...
3. Contents of the Discussion. Answers to the question(s), accompanying supports, explanations, and defense of the answers are the components of a discussion section in a hypothesis-testing paper ().Answers are not the same as the results but are a generalization of the results and should be limited to the study population ().Results (of your study or others’) are used to support the answer ...
The discussion section contains the results and outcomes of a study. An effective discussion informs readers what can be learned from your experiment and provides context for the results. ... especially when you’re submitting to a journal that selects articles based on novelty or potential impact. Regardless of what journal you are submitting ...
The “Results section” is the third most important anatomical structure of IMRAD (Introduction, Method and Material, Result, And Discussion) frameworks, the almost universally accepted framework in many journals in the late nineteenth century. 3 Before using a structured IMRAD format, research findings in scientific papers were presented in ...
After a research article has presented the substantive background, the methods and the results, the discussion section assesses the validity of results and draws conclusions by interpreting them. The discussion puts the results into a broader context and reflects their implications for theoretical (e.g. etiological) and practical (e.g ...
Journal Article: Discussion. Criteria for Success. ... This is the discussion for an article published in Science Translational Medicine. (The introduction for this article is annotated in Journal Article: ... Most of a paper reports what the data and results are. In the Discussion, you get to say what you think the results mean. ...
Dr. Pat Thomson, as usual providing great advice on Results/Discussion sections of journal articles. A handy handout on what goes in each of the IMRAD sections. Note how this article by Sollaci and Pereira on 50 years of IMRAD articles does NOT have a Conclusion section (oh, the irony!). However, their Discussion section is quite nice, albeit ...
experienced writers do when they detail findings (Results) and describe, argue for, and speculate about their significance (Discussion). Use these questions to help you evaluate what the author(s) of your mentor text are doing in the Results and Discussion sections. For the Results section of a paper, consider:
A well-crafted results and discussion section should effectively communicate your research outcomes, offer insights into their significance, and address the study's objectives and hypotheses. Here are essential guidelines to consider when writing the results and discussion sections for your academic journal research article: 1. Results Section ...
The Discussion section should be read carefully, as sometimes your interpretation of the data will differ from that of the authors.The authors may speculate about the broader meaning of the results, and offer directions for future research. Finally, the authors will discuss any limitations to the study, as well as possible sources of bias.
Most journals expect you to follow the IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) format while writing your research paper. It is possible that you might be slightly confused about what to include in the Results and Discussions sections. However, in order to effectively write both these sections, you need to understand the ...
In summary, understanding the difference between the Results and Discussion sections is crucial for effective scientific writing. The Results section focuses on presenting data in a clear and objective manner, while the Discussion section interprets that data and explains its significance.
Results and Discussion. Results and Discussion can be presented either as an integrated section or as a separate section. In this chapter, we will provide the main functions of each section using the move-and-step models similar to those introduced in the previous chapter. ... the guidelines provided by the journal, and finally yet importantly ...
This article speaks about the best ways in writing results and discussion section during your research work. Charlesworth Author Services, a trusted brand supporting the world’s leading academic publishers, institutions and authors since 1928. We only wor
The scoping review results will be disseminated through academic journals and presentations at conferences (e.g., The International Conference on Aging, Innovation & Rehabilitation). A summary of the findings will also be shared with stakeholders, including educators and rehabilitation professionals, to inform future training practices and ...
Submit an article Journal homepage. Open access. 3,659 Views 0 CrossRef citations to date ... Results . More current risky behaviours were associated with more depressive symptoms (B = 0.10, p = 0.032), lower psychological well-being ... Discussion. The present study aimed to investigate how the number of current risky health behaviours and ...
