mavii

Manantan misappropriated Carilla’s properties, which she held in trust, by failing to remit the sale price of the jewelries or return the same to Carilla upon the expiration of the stipulated period, ... Estafa may also be committed by denying untruthfully that the thing was received. Manantan denied having received jewelries from Carilla.

The Court emphasized that the offended party in estafa need not be the owner of the misappropriated goods, and that demand for the return of funds can be made to the entity involved, not necessarily directly to the individual responsible. This decision highlights the importance of accountability in handling entrusted funds and clarifies the ...

The Supreme Court elucidated the crime of simple estafa under Article 315(1)(b) of the RPC in the case of Remo, et al. vs. SOJ Devanadera, et al., G.R. No. 192925, 09 December 2016.The Court said that any person who causes pecuniary damage upon another through any of the acts of abuse of confidence or of deceit, as enumerated in Article 315 of the RPC, commits the crime of estafa or swindling.

The general rule is that criminal liability for estafa is not affected by payment, indemnification, reimbursement of amounts misappropriated, compromise, or by novation of the contract, since ...

The petitioners maintained that all the elements of Estafa under Article 315, paragraph 1(b) are present: (1) the amounts of money were received by the respondent under an obligation to make delivery or to return the same; (2) the respondent misappropriated or converted the money of the petitioners; (3) the misappropriation or conversion ...

The elements of estafa through misappropriation under Article 315, paragraph 1(b) are: (a) the offender's receipt of money, goods, or other personal property in trust, or on commission, or for administration, or under any other obligation involving the duty to deliver, or to return, the same; (b) misappropriation or conversion by the offender ...

A sum of money received by an employee on behalf of the employer is merely in the material, not juridical, possession of the employee; hence misappropriation of such money does not constitute estafa.. Thus, reiterated the Supreme Court’s First Division, in a Decision penned by Justice Jose Midas P. Marquez, as it ordered on ground of reasonable doubt the acquittal for estafa of a former ...

The document discusses the differences between theft and estafa. Theft involves taking property without consent and only material possession, while estafa involves lawful possession through an agreement or contract that is later misappropriated. For a crime to be considered estafa rather than theft, the offender must have both material and juridical possession of the property. The document ...

misappropriated. Estafa through misappropriation or conversion is defined and penalized under Article 315, paragraph 1(b) [43] of the RPC. The elements of the said crime are: (1) that money, goods, or other personal properties are received by the offender in trust, or on commission, or for administration, or under any other obligation involving ...

Swindling or estafa – refers to the crime of fraud through certain means. a. Legal basis Art. 315. Swindling (estafa). - Any person who shall defraud another by any of the means mentioned hereinbelow shall be punished by: 1st. The penalty of prisión correccional in its maximum period to prisión mayor in its minimum period, if the amount of ...

Estafa by Misappropriation - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. To be guilty of this type of estafa, the following elements must be met: 1) the offender received money/property in trust or for administration; 2) they misappropriated or converted

– Balerta was prosecuted and the RTC initially found her guilty of estafa and sentenced her accordingly. – On appeal, the CA affirmed the RTC’s decision but adjusted the penalty. – Balerta petitioned the Supreme Court contending she lacked juridical possession over the misappropriated funds. Issues:

In estafa, the accused's failure to account for the property received amounts to criminal fraud. In a contract, a party's failure to comply with his obligation is only a contractual breach. Thus, any finding that the source of obligation is a contract negates estafa. The finding, in turn, means that there is no civil liability ex delicto. Thus ...

Estafa vs. Theft: In theft, there is no consent from the owner and the property is taken without the owner’s knowledge. In Estafa, the offender typically obtains the property with the owner’s consent—albeit fraudulently or through abuse of confidence. ... Restitution of the amount swindled or the property misappropriated, if feasible ...

In estafa by abuse of confidence, the property is initially entrusted for a lawful purpose, and later misappropriated. While both crimes involve a breach of trust, the key difference is the manner in which the offender came into possession of the property. ... Estafa vs. Illegal Recruitment or Other Economic Offenses: Some financial crimes ...

All About Estafa - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Estafa is a criminal offense involving fraud or deception in the Philippines. There are several elements that must be present to constitute estafa, including fraudulent or deceitful means used to damage another party. Estafa can occur through unfaithfulness, abuse of ...

In addition, the court may order restitution or the return of stolen or misappropriated property to the offended party. Note on Bouncing Checks: The penalties for estafa involving checks overlap with or are sometimes separately pursued under Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 (the Bouncing Checks Law). Prosecutors often charge both BP 22 and estafa ...

The offense of estafa as defined and penalized under Article 315, paragraph 1(b) of the Revised Penal Code requires misappropriation or conversion of money. Absent any evidence proving misappropriation or conversion, the accused cannot be justly convicted of said crime. Also, the estafa charged herein requires breach of trust and confidence as an indispensable element.

Estafa (Article 315): Estafa involves defrauding another person by abuse of confidence or deceit. In the context of company funds, this could mean using funds entrusted to an employee for personal gain. ... The employer can file a civil suit for damages to recover the misappropriated amount and any additional losses incurred due to the employee ...