Purpose of Interpleader: The primary purpose of Rule 22 is to provide a stakeholder, who holds property or money claimed by two or more parties, with a way to avoid the risk of inconsistent judgments and the burden of defending multiple claims in different courts. By using interpleader, the stakeholder can deposit the disputed asset with the ...
Besides, for an interpleader to be proper such conflicting claims must exist (Sec. 1, Rule 62, Rules of Court). Conversely, there is impropriety where no such adverse claims can be found from the reading of the complaint. (Dean Riano) Procedure: 1. Filing: A complaint for interpleader is filed by the person against whom the conflicting claims ...
For example, a person who has property in which two or more other persons claim ownership may file a lawsuit asking the court to determine ownership. This type of action is called an “interpleader.” Procedures for interpleader are provided in Rule 22 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, which is included in the appendix to these Rules.
A federal court can hear a Rule Interpleader case if there is (i) complete diversity; and (ii) the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000. Complete diversity means that the stakeholder is not a citizen of the same state as any of the competing claimants. Amount in controversy means the value of the property that the competing claimants ...
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1937. The first paragraph provides for interpleader relief along the newer and more liberal lines of joinder in the alternative. It avoids the confusion and restrictions that developed around actions of strict interpleader and actions in the nature of interpleader.
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader filed by any person, firm, or corporation, association, or society having in his or its custody or possession money or property of the value of $500 or more, or having issued a note, bond, certificate, policy of insurance, or other instrument of value or amount of $500 ...
Rule 22-1 Rule 22. Interpleader (a) Grounds. (1) By a Plaintiff. Persons with claims that may expose a plaintiff to double ... limit — the joinder of parties allowed by Rule 20. The remedy this rule provides is in addition to — and does not supersede or limit — the remedy provided by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1335, 1397, and 2361. An action under ...
Federal courts may also hear interpleader actions under Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, even when statutory interpleader does not apply. However, Rule 22 interpleader falls under traditional diversity or federal question jurisdiction, requiring complete diversity or a federal issue.
A party requesting interpleader under Rule 22(a) may move the court for an order discharging that party from liability to the claimants. The court may discharge the party upon: (1) the party's deposit in court of the money claimed; or (2) the party's delivery of the property as the court directs. (c) Relation to Other Rules.
circles intersect, the court likely can hear the case. Keep in mind that PJ and VENUE can be waived, but SMJ cannot be waived. VENUE CHART ON INTERPLEADER ADAPTED FROM CASEBOOK SMJ PJ Venue Injunctions Rule Interpleader “Normal” (FRCP 22) Normal rules of federal SMJ: typically 28 U.S.C. § 1332 diversity; need complete diversity of
Legal Framework for Interpleader Actions Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22. The primary federal authority governing interpleader actions is Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.This rule allows a plaintiff or defendant exposed to double or multiple liability to initiate an interpleader action, even if the claims of the competing parties lack a common origin or are adverse and ...
They can be brought under Congress’s Federal Interpleader Act, which confers jurisdiction on the federal courts to hear interpleader actions in which at least one claimant is diverse from another adverse claimant and $500 is at stake. Alternatively, interpleader actions can be brought pursuant to Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
An interpleader action is a legal procedure that favors those who are unsure of whom to give their property. In an interpleader case, a third party holds property and isn't sure who the rightful owner is, so they submit it to the court for resolution. Once the court rules on the matter, the rightful owner can receive their property.
In federal actions, interpleader actions are governed by either Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 28 U.S. Code §1335 , depending on the amount in controversy and the diversity of citizenship among the parties and claimants. State procedure rules and laws govern interpleader actions for state actions.
Courts disagree about whether Section 1397 is the exclusive venue rule for statutory interpleader actions. Some courts hold that a complaint asserting a statutory interpleader claim must rely on ...
Pursuant to Rule 22(b) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, upon Order of this Court, Plaintiff will deposit the entire $[per accident policy limits] of the available per accident bodily injury coverage with the Clerk of the Court to be retained by the Clerk in an interest bearing account for the benefit of the proper and lawful ...
The motion asks the judge to make an initial ruling on whether the interpleader is rightfully with the court. Ask the clerk for some samples of interpleader documents from other cases and read the court's rules carefully to find out which procedure is followed by the court you need to use.