How to W rite an Effective Discussion in a Research Paper; a Guide to Writing the Discussion Section of a Research Article. Open Access J Addict & Psychol 5(2): 2022.
On the other hand, we think that research team consisting of different age groups has some advantages. Indeed young colleagues have the enthusiasm, and energy required for the conduction of the study, while middle-aged researchers have the knowledge to manage the research, and manuscript writing. ... As is the case with the whole article, text ...
The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because it: Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under investigation;
Therefore, discussion is a vital component of the article. An excellent discussion is well-organized. We bring to you authors a classic 6-step method for writing discussion sections, with examples to illustrate the functions and specific writing logic of each step. ... Concluding paragraphs of the discussion can explain what research will ...
The discussion reviews the findings and puts them into the context of the overall research. It brings together all the sections that came before it and allows a reader to see the connections between each part of the research paper. In a discussion section, the author engages in three necessary steps: interpretation, analysis, and explanation.
After a research article has presented the substantive background, the methods and the results, the discussion section assesses the validity of results and draws conclusions by interpreting them. The discussion puts the results into a broader context and reflects their implications for theoretical (e.g. etiological) and practical (e.g ...
DISCUSSION. Evidence does not explain itself; the results must be presented and then explained. Typical stages in the discussion: summarizing the results, discussing whether results are expected or unexpected, comparing these results to previous work, interpreting and explaining the results (often by comparison to a theory or model), and hypothesizing about their generality.
Read the journal’s guidelines on the discussion and conclusion sections. If possible, learn about the guidelines before writing the discussion to ensure you’re writing to meet their expectations. Begin with a clear statement of the principal findings. This will reinforce the main take-away for the reader and set up the rest of the discussion.
The discussion sets up your study’s conclusions. Its main goals are to present, interpret, and provide a context for your results. What is it? The discussion section provides an analysis and interpretation of the findings, compares them with previous studies, identifies limitations, and suggests future directions for research.
Journal Article: Discussion. Criteria for Success. A strong Discussion section: Tells the main conclusion of the paper in one or two sentences. ... many Discussions end with a forward-looking statement that tries to place the paper in an expected future of research in that field.
The peer review discussions, although the primary reviewers pay the most attention to the methodology of conducting the research and the results, must be very well made, because although many underestimates. Instead of conclusion we can say the fact is: the Discussion represents the heart of every scientific article. Conflict of interest:
Researchers during writing their articles usually face a challenge of presenting convincing discussion section. The purpose of writing the discussion is to convey the philosophy of project aim and ...
This lines up nicely with what we know of the scope of the discussion – it should move the reader from the narrowest scope that is the body of your paper and the research that you did to the widest scope, which relates this work to the field as a whole. This discussion does a fantastic job of doing exactly that!
The Discussion section of a research article answers, The six main components of the discussion section that will help you answer these questions for your reader are. The following list provides a brief overview of each of these components. The Common Structure of the Discussion section provides more details about how these components are ...
Taken from the Discussion section of this article on PubMed. Example 2: “This is the first human subject research using the endoscopic hemoglobin oxygen saturation imaging technology for patients with aero-digestive tract cancers or adenomas.” Taken from the Discussion section of this article on PubMed. Example 3:
However, their Discussion section is quite nice, albeit brief. This article by Höfler et al offers good advice on integrating substantive knowledge with results to create a solid Discussion section. In this article, Öner Şanlı and coauthors provide great suggestions on how to write a Discussion section of a journal article.
The discussion section is where you delve into the meaning, importance, and relevance of your results.. It should focus on explaining and evaluating what you found, showing how it relates to your literature review, and making an argument in support of your overall conclusion.It should not be a second results section.. There are different ways to write this section, but you can focus your ...
Responding to peers in the discussion board is a typical requirement in many Walden courses, and they also serve an important purpose – they allow you to exchange ideas, academically debate, and see topics through the perspectives of other people. ... introduces additional research on the topic, and keeps the conversation going by sharing ...
“This research, however, is subject to several limitations.” “The primary limitation to the generalization of these results is…” “Nonetheless, these results must be interpreted with caution and a number of limitations should be borne in mind.” Discussion Part 5: Giving Recommendations for Further Research
