mavii

Therefore, discussion is a vital component of the article. An excellent discussion is well-organized. We bring to you authors a classic 6-step method for writing discussion sections, with examples to illustrate the functions and specific writing logic of each step. Take a look at how you can impress journal reviewers with a concise and focused ...

In the last paragraph of the Discussion section “strong points” of the study should be mentioned using “constrained”, and “not too strongly assertive” statements. Indicating limitations of the study will reflect objectivity of the authors, and provide answers to the questions which will be directed by the reviewers of the journal.

The discussion section is where you delve into the meaning, importance, and relevance of your results.. It should focus on explaining and evaluating what you found, showing how it relates to your literature review and paper or dissertation topic, and making an argument in support of your overall conclusion.It should not be a second results section.. There are different ways to write this ...

Although most journals have no page limits for discussion , the discussion section should be kept brief , being neither too long nor too short . The length of the discussion section should not exceed the sum of other parts (introduction, materials and methods, and results) ( 3 ), the typical length of the discussion section is 3 - 4 pages, 6 ...

DISCUSSION. Evidence does not explain itself; the results must be presented and then explained. Typical stages in the discussion: summarizing the results, discussing whether results are expected or unexpected, comparing these results to previous work, interpreting and explaining the results (often by comparison to a theory or model), and hypothesizing about their generality.

Discussion is mainly the section in a research paper that makes the readers understand the exact meaning of the results achieved in a study by exploring the significant points of the research, its ...

Journal Article: Discussion. Criteria for Success. A strong Discussion section: ... The balance between expert and non-expert readers will depend on the journal you submit to. High-profile, general readership journals will have more non-expert readers, while more technical, field-specific journals can have almost exclusively expert readers. ...

Most research articles in journals have a standard structure with sections entitled “Introduction,” “Methods,” “Results,” and “Discussion.” Each has a clear remit except for the Discussion, which, if you’re a less experienced writer, may seem a hopelessly vague description. The occasional alternative of “Conclusion” or “General Discussion” isn’t much better.

Learn how to write a Discussion for a research paper. Discuss study findings and include implications, limitations, and recommendations. 1-888-627-6631; edit@wordvice.com; ... Now that we’ve addressed the more technical portions of your journal manuscript, let’s turn to the analytical segments of your research article. In this article, we ...

It means, the chapter - Discussion represents the heart of every scientific article. The writing of the discussion itself must point to the specificity of the results of the work itself. Author wants to point out the importance of quality description of chapter Discussion, when scientists prepare their articles with presenting own results ...

discussion from veering too far away from the subject at hand. Remember, this is an academic class discussion and not a free-form chat. If the discussion has strayed too far afield or if you need to move on due to time constraints, simply interrupt the discussion, acknowledge the current focus of the discussion, and announce that you want to bring

The focus here is how to lead discussion of a scientific journal article, but our group maintains flexibility by inviting outside seminar speakers, discussing the research of group members, and taking on extended discussions of book-length works, among other activities. Choice of Topic

However, their Discussion section is quite nice, albeit brief. This article by Höfler et al offers good advice on integrating substantive knowledge with results to create a solid Discussion section. In this article, Öner Şanlı and coauthors provide great suggestions on how to write a Discussion section of a journal article.

The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because it: Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under investigation;

Science departments at many universities convene regular discussions of contemporary research, journal articles, or even ideas or studies done by group participants. This forum thus provides an opportunity to evaluate embryonic or fully-fledged research results, to keep abreast of newly published ideas or books, and to develop or teach ...

The study, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on April 24, used large-scale epidemiological modeling to simulate the spread of infectious diseases in the United States at various childhood vaccination levels. Even at current immunization rates, researchers predict that measles may become endemic again — circulating in the U.S. — within two decades; with ...

Before undertaking this study, a comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using several databases, including Web of Science and PubMed. Studies that related to the health impacts of phthalates were examined, specifically di-2-ethylhexylphthalate (DEHP), with search terms such as “DEHP,” “phthalates,” “cardiovascular ...

Some residents and junior staff members have asked me how to write the 'discussion part' of a scientific paper. In reviewing the manuscripts of original articles and case reports submitted to journals including the Archives of Plastic Surgery, I don't infrequently find or I frequently find that the authors have written summaries of references cited that are not directly related to the topic ...

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org. Supplementary Material Protocol (nejmoa2404512_protocol.pdf)