Welcome to the Arizona Supreme Court Opinions. From these web pages you can view the most recent Opinions and Memorandum Decisions released by the Arizona Supreme Court. Please note: Only the bound volumes of Arizona Reports contain the final, official report of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of the State ...
Access court case information for Arizona courts online.
Disclaimer: The Arizona Supreme Court, Division One of the Court of Appeals, and Division Two of the Court of Appeals, and their judicial employees will not be liable for inaccurate or untimely information on this web site, or for misinterpretation or misuse of such information. Viewer disclosure of information on this web site to third parties is done at the sole risk of the viewer.
Court: Eleventh Circuit › Alabama › U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Type: Other Statutes › Consumer Credit Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts.
Welcome to FindLaw's searchable database of United States Court of Appeals decisions since January 1974. Cases are browsable by date and searchable by docket number, case title, and full text. Party name Keyword Docket number
For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) is not strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one district court in New York is not ...
entitled to qualified immunity. After the district court certified its partial judgment against Plaintiffs for immediate appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), Plaintiffs appealed that judgment as well. We reverse the district court’s denial of summary judgment to partial Defendants, and we affirm the court’s partial of grant
For information on how to appeal a decision from a Justice or Municipal court, please contact that originating court for further instructions. The appeal must be filed in that originating court. If you have already filed your appeal in the Lower Court and the Lower Court advised you that your case has been transferred to Superior Court, please call (602) 37-CLERK, or (602) 372-5375.
If you believe that the Court of Appeals did not correctly rule in your case, you can file a Petition for Review. The first thing to do is to complete the court forms to file with the Arizona Supreme Court.. Note: Filing must take place within 30 days after the Court of Appeals issues its decision. To file with the Arizona Supreme Court, the following steps need to occur:
The court entered judgment on the crossclaims against both James and Susan pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure (Rules), awarding $75,000 in damages and attorney’s fees. ... after the deadline to appeal the Rule 54(b) judgment passed, James and Susan filed this appeal. See ARCAP 9(a). DISCUSSION
Arizona has two appellate courts: the court of appeals is the intermediate appellate court and the Supreme Court is the court of last resort. The court of appeals was established in 1965 as the first level of appeal up from superior court. It has two divisions: Division One in Phoenix (19 judges) and Division Two in Tucson (nine judges).
The judgments TNA is receiving for publication are joining the archive’s extensive collection of court records, dating back 800 years. The new service is intended to increase transparency and secure free access for all. Court of Appeal Civil Judgments (opens in a new tab). Court of Appeal Criminal Judgments (opens in a new tab).
PHOENIX – Attorney General Kris Mayes today joined other attorneys general in filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, supporting fair housing organizations in their appeal of a ruling that lifted a temporary restraining order blocking the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) from cancelling these organizations’ grant funding.
The Court of Appeal ruled unanimously that a committee hadn’t treated Harry unfairly when it decided to review his protection on a case-by-case basis each time he visits the U.K. The ruling is likely to leave the Duke of Sussex with a large bill to pay the U.K. government’s legal fees — in addition to his own lawyers’ costs.
The Duke of Sussex launched a challenge in the Court of Appeal over a dispute with the government about his security. ... Sir Geoffrey Vos delivers his judgement at the Court of Appeal. Sean ...
United States Court of Appeals cases. FindLaw's database of United States Court of Appeals features decisions since January 1974. You can browse decisions by date and search by docket number, case title, and full text.
The documents were filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on May 1 under Rule 24.1 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article II ...
Smith-Petersen, and Batway. The district court entered summary judgment for Defendant SmithPetersen on - Plaintiff’s claim of excessive force, brought under § 1983, holding that she was protected by qualified immunity, and the court remanded Plaintiff’s state claims to state court for resolution. We reverse and remand with respect to the