mavii

Condonation Ruling: Case Number: NCT252538/2022/101(1) NCC vs CLAREMONT HOLDINGS PTY LTD 4 14.After the ruling was issued on 24 January 2023, the NCC was given 15 business days to file its answering affidavit to the review application that expired on 14 February 2023. However, the answering affidavit was filed outside of the Tribunal

%PDF-1.5 %µµµµ 1 0 obj >>> endobj 2 0 obj > endobj 3 0 obj >/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 595.32 842.04] /Contents 4 0 R/Group >/Tabs ...

The late service and filing of the applicant's answering affidavit in the counterapplication, deposed to on 21 November 2023 and served on 10 January 2024, is hereby condoned. C. The applicant shall pay the respondent’s costs of this application for condonation, including costs of counsel on scale A, in accordance with Rule 67A of the uniform ...

application for condonation and an application for urgent interim relief addressed to the MC. Instead they followed the much more expensive route ... 18. I now proceed to answer the founding affidavit deposed to by JOHANNES DIEDERIK VAN DER MERWE. However, in the short time available I only do so in an abbreviated manner. 19. Ad paragraph1

The plaintiff is applying for condonation of its late filing of the answering affidavit. [4]. The plaintiff, in its application for condonation of the late filing of its answering affidavit, avers that it believed that the defendant’s application to compel would not proceed to hearing as he had already replied to the notices in ...

Condonation for late filing of the respondent’s answering affidavit. [3] Before dealing with the substance of the matter the First Respondent’s application for condonation for the late filing of his answering affidavit in this matter must be considered. [4] The reason for the late filing is explained by the Respondent as being due to the

an affidavit opposing an application for condonation by the applicant. The applicant has three (3) days to file a replying affidavit. 8. The respondent must forward a copy of the affidavit to the other party, as well as to the CCMA, within the stipulated 5 days. Proof must be attached to show that the affidavit has been forwarded to the other ...

On 09 March 2022 the Respondent served its answering affidavit. [5] The Applicant refers to Rules 30 and 30A in its application to strike out the Respondent’s answering affidavit and to dismiss the Respondent’s application for condonation. Rule 30 of the Uniform Rules of the Court states as follows:

Answering affidavit. The Respondent has the right to answer the allegations in the Applicant’s founding affidavit. This is done by way of the Respondent’s answering affidavit (aka opposing affidavit) that is made by the Respondent personally, or duly authorised person if the Respondent is not a natural person, and it is filed together with ...

It was averred that there is no application for condonation before the court and the answering affidavit and heads of argument should be expunged from the record as it is strange to make an application for condonation through an answering affidavit. For this, reliance was placed on the case of Cheney v Cheney HH 78/18. It was observed that the ...

condonation contains a number of generalised averments without any attempt to explain the delay in terms of a timeframe, when the bank statements became available and why the affidavit could not have been filed sooner. On this basis it was submitted that the application for condonation should be dismissed and the replying affidavit

affidavit is a section headed “Condonation” in which the applicant sets out the grounds upon which she seeks condonation for the late filing of her replying affidavit. 5. The respondent’s objection to the applicant’s request for condnation is that o the applicant did not deliver a condonation application as contemplated by ule 6, R

applications. The answering affidavits of the respondents were filed one day late. They sought condonation in their answering affidavit for the late filing thereof. In both the FourieFismer and Diale applications the applicants opposed the condonation sought. I am of the view that this case is of importance to the parties and the general population

The answering affidavit of the Applicant demonstrated the lack of merit in the first application specifically and pointed out its deficiencies. 16. Further, pursuant to the directions issued on 11 November 2008, the ... main affidavit in the condonation and tender application, does not suggest that the Respondent knew that an application for ...

The late service and filing of the applicant's answering affidavit in the counterapplication, deposed to on 21 November 2023 and served on 10 January 2024, is hereby condoned. C. The applicant shall pay the respondent’s costs of this application for condonation, including costs of counsel on scale A, in accordance with Rule 67A of the uniform ...

• Affidavit Regarding Minor Children • Child Support Worksheet ©Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County Page 2 of 2 DRLSC31p 092422 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Step 5: File the papers at the Court: Go to the Clerk of Superior Court to file your papers. The Court is open from 8:00 a.m. - 5:00

Law Library Resource Center . SERVICE in a CIVIL CASE: Frequently Asked Questions . 1. What is a “Summons”? A summons is a court order that gives the defendant noticethat a lawsuit has been filed against him or her.It also explains that a judgment will be made against him or her if the defendant does not answer the complaint

Filing an answer will give you an opportunity to defend your case in court and start the timelines for filing disclosures. Watch A Creditor Filed a Lawsuit Against Me or go to the webpage. You will be required to pay a filing fee when filing an answer. If you cannot afford the filing fee, you can ask the clerk for a fee waiver/deferral application.

12. The application for condonation should be granted with no order as to costs alternatively with an order directing the Second Respondent to pay the wasted costs on the party and party scale incurred pursuant to the preparation of a separate replying affidavit to my answering affidavit and considering the application for condonation.